NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Vertix 2S vs Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED

Coros Vertix 2S vs Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED

What Vertix 2S does better (3) and where Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Coros Vertix 2S
Coros · 2024Vertix 2S
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $700
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
8.9Score
5 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
4.4Display7.5
9.8Battery life9.4
4.9Health tracking8.3
5.2Sports & outdoor8.2
7.8Build & durability6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Vertix 2SQuatix 8 51mm AMOLED
50.3 × 50.31651 × 5114.7
Vertix 2SQuatix 8 51mm AMOLEDDifference
Height50.3 mm51 mm−0.7 mm
Width50.3 mm51 mm−0.7 mm
Thickness16 mm14.7 mm+1.3 mm
Weight87 g92 g−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Vertix 2S better than Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 29 days+24%
  2. GPS battery life118 h vs 84 h+40%
  3. Weight87 g vs 92 g+6%

Why is Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED better than Vertix 2S?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Vertix 2S: Yes
  2. Sport profiles43 vs 992.3×
  3. Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
  4. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  5. Thickness16 mm vs 14.7 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare