Dimensions
Size comparison
Beatbox102
| Beatbox | 102 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52.5 mm | 114.5 mm | −62 mm |
| Width | 52.5 mm | 50 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13.1 mm | 13.7 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 74 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Beatbox better than 102?
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 128 px2.8×
- Pixel density309 ppi vs 116 ppi2.7×
- Weight64.9 g vs 74 g+14%
- Thickness13.1 mm vs 13.7 mm+5%
Why is 102 better than Beatbox?
- Screen size1.65″ vs 1.77″+7%
- Battery capacity730 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 52 mm | — |
| Weight | 64.9 g | 74 g |
| Thickness | 13.1 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 52.5 mm | 114.5 mm |
| Width | 52.5 mm | 50 mm |
| Water resistance | 1 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | Gray, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.65″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 309 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 730 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Unisoc SC6531E |
