NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Beatbox vs GTS 4

Cubot Beatbox vs Zeblaze GTS 4

What Beatbox does better (1) and where GTS 4 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cubot Beatbox
Cubot · 2026Beatbox
3.6Score
1 advantage
vs
Zeblaze GTS 4
Zeblaze · 2026GTS 4
9.2Score
4 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
3.6Display9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

BeatboxGTS 4
52.5 × 52.513.147 × 478.7
BeatboxGTS 4Difference
Case size52.5 mm47 mm+5.5 mm
Thickness13.1 mm8.7 mm+4.4 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Beatbox better than GTS 4?

  1. Battery capacity730 mAh vs 260 mAh2.8×

Why is GTS 4 better than Beatbox?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Beatbox: Yes
  2. Screen size1.65″ vs 1.94″+18%
  3. Thickness13.1 mm vs 8.7 mm+51%
  4. Resolution (width)360 px vs 466 px+29%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare