NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C29 vs CMF Watch Pro 2

Cubot C29 vs Nothing CMF Watch Pro 2

What C29 does better (3) and where CMF Watch Pro 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C29
Cubot · 2024C29
4.4Score
3 advantages
vs
Nothing CMF Watch Pro 2
Nothing · 2024CMF Watch Pro 2
5.5Score
4 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
4.3Display5.2
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

C29CMF Watch Pro 2
49.5 × 51.913.445 × 4513.6
C29CMF Watch Pro 2Difference
Height51.9 mm45 mm+6.9 mm
Width49.5 mm45 mm+4.5 mm
Thickness13.4 mm13.6 mm−0.2 mm
Weight42 g44 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C29 better than CMF Watch Pro 2?

  1. Screen size1.52″ vs 1.32″+15%
  2. Weight42.1 g vs 44.4 g+5%
  3. Battery capacity410 mAh vs 305 mAh+34%

Why is CMF Watch Pro 2 better than C29?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · C29: Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · C29: Yes
  3. Resolution (width)360 px vs 466 px+29%
  4. Pixel density335 ppi vs 353 ppi+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare