Dimensions
Size comparison
C29BT101
| C29 | BT101 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 51.9 mm | 58.3 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 46.1 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | 13.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C29 better than BT101?
- Pixel density335 ppi vs 250 ppi+34%
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 320 px+12%
Why is BT101 better than C29?
- Screen size1.52″ vs 2.02″+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 52 mm | 58 mm |
| Weight | 42.1 g | — |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | 13.3 mm |
| Height | 51.9 mm | 58.3 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 46.1 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Tempered glass |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 1 ATM | 1 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.52″ | 2.02″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 390 px |
| Pixel density | 335 ppi | 250 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | 410 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, barometer, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
