Dimensions
Size comparison
C3Watch
| C3 | Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 46 mm | 36.5 mm | +9.5 mm |
| Width | 46 mm | 25.6 mm | +20.4 mm |
| Thickness | 14.8 mm | 11.8 mm | +3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C3 better than Watch?
- Battery capacity260 mAh vs 160 mAh+62%
Why is Watch better than C3?
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 320 px+33%
- Thickness14.8 mm vs 11.8 mm+25%
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 323 ppi+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 36 mm |
| Weight | — | 31 g |
| Thickness | 14.8 mm | 11.8 mm |
| Height | 46 mm | 36.5 mm |
| Width | 46 mm | 25.6 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Scratch-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.4″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 323 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 380 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 260 mAh | 160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
