2.2Display2.2
2.5Smart features2.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
C3Watch Live
| C3 | Watch Live | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 46 mm | 40.6 mm | +5.4 mm |
| Width | 46 mm | 34.6 mm | +11.4 mm |
| Thickness | 14.8 mm | 10.8 mm | +4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C3 better than Watch Live?
C3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch Live better than C3?
- Thickness14.8 mm vs 10.8 mm+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 41 mm |
| Weight | — | 35.7 g |
| Thickness | 14.8 mm | 10.8 mm |
| Height | 46 mm | 40.6 mm |
| Width | 46 mm | 34.6 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Scratch-resistant glass | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 260 mAh | — |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
