NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C7 vs E4

Cubot C7 vs Energizer E4

What C7 does better (4) and where E4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C7
Cubot · 2021C7
3.6Score
4 advantages
vs
Energizer E4
Energizer · 2022E4
3.8Score
3 advantages≈ $11
Higher score
2.7Display2.9
2.5Smart features3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

C7E4
44 × 441246 × 11513.5
C7E4Difference
Height44 mm115 mm−71 mm
Width44 mm46 mm−2 mm
Thickness12 mm13.5 mm−1.5 mm
Weight34 g65 g−31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C7 better than E4?

  1. Weight34 g vs 65 g+91%
  2. Pixel density220 ppi vs 116 ppi+90%
  3. Resolution (width)240 px vs 128 px+88%
  4. Thickness12 mm vs 13.5 mm+12%

Why is E4 better than C7?

  1. Battery capacity260 mAh vs 1,000 mAh3.8×
  2. SpeakerNo · C7: Yes
  3. Screen size1.54″ vs 1.77″+15%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare