Dimensions
Size comparison
C9E3
| C9 | E3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43 mm | 113.9 mm | −70.9 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 48 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 14 mm | −4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C9 better than E3?
- Pixel density265 ppi vs 116 ppi2.3×
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 128 px+88%
- Thickness10 mm vs 14 mm+40%
Why is E3 better than C9?
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 1,000 mAh4.8×
- Screen size1.28″ vs 1.77″+38%
- SpeakerNo · C9: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 70 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 43 mm | 113.9 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 48 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Scratch-resistant glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Pink | Black, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.28″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 265 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 2.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Spreadtrum SC6531E |
