NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GT3 vs Venu 4 41mm

Cubot GT3 vs Garmin Venu 4 41mm

What GT3 does better (2) and where Venu 4 41mm wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
Garmin Venu 4 41mm
Garmin · 2025Venu 4 41mm
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ $550
9.8Display4.8
5.0Health tracking8.2
4.7Sports & outdoor3.5
3.9Smart features7.1
3.2Build & durability3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT3Venu 4 41mm
48.2 × 59.313.441 × 4112
GT3Venu 4 41mmDifference
Height59.3 mm41 mm+18.3 mm
Width48.2 mm41 mm+7.2 mm
Thickness13.4 mm12 mm+1.4 mm
Weight57 g33 g+24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT3 better than Venu 4 41mm?

  1. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.2″+63%
  2. Resolution (width)410 px vs 390 px+5%

Why is Venu 4 41mm better than GT3?

  1. NFC paymentsNo · GT3: Yes
  2. Weight57 g vs 33 g+73%
  3. Thickness13.4 mm vs 12 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare