NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GT3 vs Venu 4 45mm

Cubot GT3 vs Garmin Venu 4 45mm

What GT3 does better (2) and where Venu 4 45mm wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
Garmin Venu 4 45mm
Garmin · 2025Venu 4 45mm
6.3Score
4 advantages≈ $550
9.8Display5.5
5.0Health tracking8.2
4.7Sports & outdoor3.5
3.9Smart features7.1
3.2Build & durability2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT3Venu 4 45mm
48.2 × 59.313.445 × 4512.5
GT3Venu 4 45mmDifference
Height59.3 mm45 mm+14.3 mm
Width48.2 mm45 mm+3.2 mm
Thickness13.4 mm12.5 mm+0.9 mm
Weight57 g38 g+19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT3 better than Venu 4 45mm?

  1. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.4″+40%
  2. Pixel density331 ppi vs 324 ppi+2%

Why is Venu 4 45mm better than GT3?

  1. NFC paymentsNo · GT3: Yes
  2. Weight57 g vs 38 g+50%
  3. Resolution (width)410 px vs 454 px+11%
  4. Thickness13.4 mm vs 12.5 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare