Dimensions
Size comparison
N1E3
| N1 | E3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 49.5 mm | 113.9 mm | −64.4 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 48 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 70 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is N1 better than E3?
- Pixel density265 ppi vs 116 ppi2.3×
- Weight55 g vs 70 g+27%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 128 px+88%
Why is E3 better than N1?
- Screen size1.28″ vs 1.77″+38%
- Battery capacity450 mAh vs 1,000 mAh2.2×
- SpeakerNo · N1: Yes
- Thickness14.5 mm vs 14 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 50 mm | — |
| Weight | 55 g | 70 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 49.5 mm | 113.9 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 48 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Scratch-resistant glass | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.28″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 265 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 450 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 2.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Spreadtrum SC6531E |
