NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. U1 vs iGo Watch 4! JW-600

Cubot U1 vs Forever iGo Watch 4! JW-600

What U1 does better (3) and where iGo Watch 4! JW-600 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot U1
Cubot · 2025U1
4.2Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
Forever iGo Watch 4! JW-600
Forever · 2025iGo Watch 4! JW-600
3 advantages≈ $40
3.9Display4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

U1iGo Watch 4! JW-600
42.4 × 49.811.410.6 × 46256
U1iGo Watch 4! JW-600Difference
Height49.8 mm46 mm+3.8 mm
Width42.4 mm10.6 mm+31.8 mm
Thickness11.4 mm256 mm−244.6 mm
Weight44 g34 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is U1 better than iGo Watch 4! JW-600?

  1. Screen size1.93″ vs 1.28″+51%
  2. Thickness11.4 mm vs 256 mm22.5×
  3. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 280 mAh+7%

Why is iGo Watch 4! JW-600 better than U1?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · U1: Yes
  2. Weight43.8 g vs 33.9 g+29%
  3. Resolution (width)240 px vs 416 px+73%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare