NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. X1 vs FW55 Aurum Pro

Cubot X1 vs Maxcom FW55 Aurum Pro

What X1 does better (4) and where FW55 Aurum Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot X1
Cubot · 2024X1
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Maxcom FW55 Aurum Pro
Maxcom · 2023FW55 Aurum Pro
5.1Score
2 advantages≈ $45
8.8Display4.1
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

X1FW55 Aurum Pro
44.5 × 52.714.238 × 25510
X1FW55 Aurum ProDifference
Height52.7 mm255 mm−202.3 mm
Width44.5 mm38 mm+6.5 mm
Thickness14.2 mm10 mm+4.2 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X1 better than FW55 Aurum Pro?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · FW55 Aurum Pro: No
  2. Battery capacity850 mAh vs 230 mAh3.7×
  3. Screen size2.13″ vs 1.7″+25%
  4. Resolution (width)410 px vs 240 px+71%

Why is FW55 Aurum Pro better than X1?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · X1: Yes
  2. Thickness14.2 mm vs 10 mm+42%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare