Dimensions
Size comparison
X1Watch S2
| X1 | Watch S2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52.7 mm | 46.5 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Width | 44.5 mm | 46.5 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 14.2 mm | 11 mm | +3.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X1 better than Watch S2?
- Screen size2.13″ vs 1.43″+49%
- Battery capacity850 mAh vs 380 mAh2.2×
Why is Watch S2 better than X1?
- Built-in GPSNo · X1: Yes
- Water resistance2 ATM vs 5 ATM2.5×
- Thickness14.2 mm vs 11 mm+29%
- Resolution (width)410 px vs 466 px+14%
- Pixel density304 ppi vs 326 ppi+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 53 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 41 g |
| Thickness | 14.2 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | 52.7 mm | 46.5 mm |
| Width | 44.5 mm | 46.5 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Tempered glass | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Water resistance | 2 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Gray | Gray, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.13″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 410 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 502 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 304 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 850 mAh | 380 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, barometer, compass | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
