NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. X3 vs Venu 4 41mm

Cubot X3 vs Garmin Venu 4 41mm

What X3 does better (3) and where Venu 4 41mm wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cubot X3
Cubot · 2025X3
5.4Score
3 advantages
vs
Garmin Venu 4 41mm
Garmin · 2025Venu 4 41mm
5.8Score
4 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
4.3Display4.8
5.0Health tracking8.2
8.0Sports & outdoor3.5
3.9Smart features7.1
2.7Build & durability3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

X3Venu 4 41mm
53.8 × 53.813.541 × 4112
X3Venu 4 41mmDifference
Height53.8 mm41 mm+12.8 mm
Width53.8 mm41 mm+12.8 mm
Thickness13.5 mm12 mm+1.5 mm
Weight95 g33 g+62 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X3 better than Venu 4 41mm?

  1. Screen size1.73″ vs 1.2″+44%
  2. Resolution (width)466 px vs 390 px+19%
  3. Pixel density381 ppi vs 325 ppi+17%

Why is Venu 4 41mm better than X3?

  1. Weight94.6 g vs 33 g2.9×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · X3: Yes
  3. NFC paymentsNo · X3: Yes
  4. Thickness13.5 mm vs 12 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare