NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. X3 vs CMF Watch 3 Pro

Cubot X3 vs Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro

What X3 does better (4) and where CMF Watch 3 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot X3
Cubot · 2025X3
5.4Score
4 advantages
vs
Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro
Nothing · 2025CMF Watch 3 Pro
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
4.3Display5.0
5.0Health tracking5.0
8.0Sports & outdoor8.0
3.9Smart features4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

X3CMF Watch 3 Pro
53.8 × 53.813.547 × 4714.4
X3CMF Watch 3 ProDifference
Height53.8 mm47 mm+6.8 mm
Width53.8 mm47 mm+6.8 mm
Thickness13.5 mm14.4 mm−0.9 mm
Weight95 g51 g+44 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X3 better than CMF Watch 3 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity900 mAh vs 350 mAh2.6×
  2. Screen size1.73″ vs 1.43″+21%
  3. Pixel density381 ppi vs 326 ppi+17%
  4. Thickness13.5 mm vs 14.4 mm+7%

Why is CMF Watch 3 Pro better than X3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · X3: Yes
  2. Weight94.6 g vs 51 g+85%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare