NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. BFH-19 vs FW34

Denver BFH-19 vs Maxcom FW34

What BFH-19 does better (0) and where FW34 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Denver BFH-19
Denver · 2021BFH-19
0 advantages≈ $35
vs
Maxcom FW34
Maxcom · 2022FW34
3.7Score
3 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
2.1Display2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

BFH-19FW34
42 × 4223 × 4311
BFH-19FW34Difference
Case size42 mm23 mm+19 mm
Weight66 g24 g+42 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BFH-19 better than FW34?

BFH-19 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is FW34 better than BFH-19?

  1. Weight66 g vs 24 g2.8×
  2. Screen size0.96″ vs 1.08″+13%
  3. Battery capacity90 mAh vs 105 mAh+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare