vs
2.1Display4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
BFH-19TicWatch GTH
| BFH-19 | TicWatch GTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 42 mm | 10.5 mm | +31.5 mm |
| Weight | 66 g | 46 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BFH-19 better than TicWatch GTH?
BFH-19 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TicWatch GTH better than BFH-19?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 10 days+43%
- Screen size0.96″ vs 1.55″+61%
- Battery capacity90 mAh vs 260 mAh2.9×
- Weight66 g vs 46.3 g+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | 10 mm |
| Weight | 66 g | 46.3 g |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | Polyurethan |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 0.96″ | 1.55″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 360 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 10 days |
| Battery capacity | 90 mAh | 260 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | accelerometer |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 1 | — |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Free RTOS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
