Why is SW-162 better than 2.0 SW022?
SW-162 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 2.0 SW022 better than SW-162?
- Screen size1.4″ vs 1.7″+21%
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 200 mAh+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 45 mm |
| Thickness | — | 10.4 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.4″ | 1.7″ |
| Panel | IPS | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 280 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS |
