vs
8.8Display8.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is SWC-195 better than Ecowatch 4?
- Screen size2.04″ vs 1.85″+10%
Why is Ecowatch 4 better than SWC-195?
- Resolution (width)368 px vs 390 px+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 45 g |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.04″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | 450 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 260 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
