Why is SWC-338 better than Band 9?
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 194 px+24%
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 180 mAh+17%
Why is Band 9 better than SWC-338?
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.47″+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 25 mm |
| Weight | — | 23 g |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Height | — | 43.4 mm |
| Width | — | 24.9 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 194 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 368 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 14 days |
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Charging | — | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
