Why is SWC-338 better than Fit FW42?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Fit FW42: No
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 180 mAh+17%
Why is Fit FW42 better than SWC-338?
Fit FW42 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Stainless steel |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
