Why is SWC-342 better than 5010?
SWC-342 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 5010 better than SWC-342?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)3 days vs 7 days2.3×
- Screen size1.2″ vs 1.38″+15%
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 300 mAh+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Thickness | 11 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Silikon |
| Colours | — | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.2″ | 1.38″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | 7 days |
| Battery life (hours) | — | 168 h |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android | — |
| Chipset | Realtek 8763C | — |
