vs
2.0Display3.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is SWC-342 better than Watch 6010?
SWC-342 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch 6010 better than SWC-342?
- Screen size1.2″ vs 1.65″+38%
- Thickness11 mm vs 10 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 35 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | — | 255 mm |
| Width | — | 37 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Kunststoff |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.2″ | 1.65″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | — |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android | iOS, Android |
| Chipset | Realtek 8763C | — |
