vs
2.0Display4.1
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is SWC-342 better than FW55 Aurum Pro?
SWC-342 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is FW55 Aurum Pro better than SWC-342?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)3 days vs 6 days2×
- Screen size1.2″ vs 1.7″+42%
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 230 mAh+28%
- Thickness11 mm vs 10 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 46 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | — | 255 mm |
| Width | — | 38 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.2″ | 1.7″ |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 280 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | 6 days |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 230 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 3 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android | — |
| Chipset | Realtek 8763C | — |
