Dimensions
Size comparison
CS2105 4G
| CS2 | 105 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43.8 mm | 121 mm | −77.2 mm |
| Width | 36.9 mm | 50 mm | −13.1 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 14.5 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 80 g | −45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CS2 better than 105 4G?
- Weight35 g vs 80.2 g2.3×
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×
- Pixel density201 ppi vs 111 ppi+81%
- Thickness10.5 mm vs 14.5 mm+38%
Why is 105 4G better than CS2?
- LTE (cellular)No · CS2: Yes
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 1,020 mAh3.4×
- SpeakerNo · CS2: Yes
- Screen size1.69″ vs 1.8″+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | — |
| Weight | 35 g | 80.2 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 14.5 mm |
| Height | 43.8 mm | 121 mm |
| Width | 36.9 mm | 50 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Rose Gold, Silver | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.69″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 201 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 1,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.1 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | Realtek 8762C | — |
