Dimensions
Size comparison
WatchPSW 200
| Watch | PSW 200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 44 mm | 44 mm | = |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 9 mm | +4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch better than PSW 200?
Watch has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PSW 200 better than Watch?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 12 days+50%
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Watch: Yes
- Screen size1.28″ vs 1.32″+3%
- Thickness13 mm vs 9 mm+44%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | 44 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 9 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.28″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 8 days | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
