Dimensions
Size comparison
E13102
| E13 | 102 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 116 mm | 114.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm | = |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 13.7 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 73 g | 74 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E13 better than 102?
E13 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 102 better than E13?
- Thickness14.5 mm vs 13.7 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 73 g | 74 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 116 mm | 114.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Black | Gray, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261D | Unisoc SC6531E |
