NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. E130S vs 102 4G

Energizer E130S vs HMD 102 4G

What E130S does better (2) and where 102 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Energizer E130S
Energizer · 2022E130S
4.9Score
2 advantages≈ $20
vs
HMD 102 4G
HMD · 2025102 4G
5.1Score
3 advantages≈ $20
Higher score
2.9Display3.8
6.5Smart features6.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

E130S102 4G
49.2 × 11514.850.2 × 118.214.3
E130S102 4GDifference
Height115 mm118.2 mm−3.2 mm
Width49.2 mm50.2 mm−1 mm
Thickness14.8 mm14.3 mm+0.5 mm
Weight87 g84 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is E130S better than 102 4G?

  1. Pixel density116 ppi vs 100 ppi+16%
  2. Resolution (width)128 px vs 120 px+7%

Why is 102 4G better than E130S?

  1. Screen size1.77″ vs 2″+13%
  2. Weight87 g vs 84.2 g+3%
  3. Thickness14.8 mm vs 14.3 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare