Dimensions
Size comparison
E2E4
| E2 | E4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 116 mm | 115 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 46 mm | +4 mm |
| Thickness | 13.9 mm | 13.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 65 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E2 better than E4?
E2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is E4 better than E2?
- Weight74.3 g vs 65 g+14%
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+25%
- Thickness13.9 mm vs 13.5 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 74.3 g | 65 g |
| Thickness | 13.9 mm | 13.5 mm |
| Height | 116 mm | 115 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 46 mm |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, Yellow | Black, Blue, Red, Gold, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Sensors | — | No |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Spreadtrum SC6531E | Unisoc SC6531DA |
