vs
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Air better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
- Weight12 g vs 200 g16.7×
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than Air?
Ice Fit RT 3.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 35 mm | — |
| Weight | 12 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 450 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 350 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android, iOS | iOS |
