Why is Charge 6 better than Band 9?
Charge 6 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Band 9 better than Charge 6?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 14 days2×
- Weight51 g vs 23 g2.2×
- Screen size1″ vs 1.47″+47%
- Battery capacity65 mAh vs 180 mAh2.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 25 mm |
| Weight | 51 g | 23 g |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Height | — | 43.4 mm |
| Width | — | 24.9 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 194 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 368 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 14 days |
| Battery capacity | 65 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Charging | — | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
