Why is Charge 6 better than Fit 1.0?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 5 days+40%
- Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Charge 6?
- Screen size1″ vs 1.78″+78%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 51 g | — |
| Thickness | — | 12 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1″ | 1.78″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 368 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 448 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 65 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
