vs
4.9Display5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
iGo Watch 4! JW-600Moto Watch
| iGo Watch 4! JW-600 | Moto Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 46 mm | 47 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 10.6 mm | 47 mm | −36.4 mm |
| Thickness | 256 mm | 12 mm | +244 mm |
| Weight | 34 g | 35 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iGo Watch 4! JW-600 better than Moto Watch?
- Weight33.9 g vs 35 g+3%
Why is Moto Watch better than iGo Watch 4! JW-600?
- Thickness256 mm vs 12 mm21.3×
- Screen size1.28″ vs 1.43″+12%
- Resolution (width)416 px vs 464 px+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | 33.9 g | 35 g |
| Thickness | 256 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | 46 mm | 47 mm |
| Width | 10.6 mm | 47 mm |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Volcanic Ash, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.28″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | OLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 416 px | 464 px |
| Resolution (height) | 416 px | 464 px |
| Pixel density | — | 317 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 280 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Microphone | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Unspecified |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |









