NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S42 vs Forerunner 255

Garmin Approach S42 vs Garmin Forerunner 255

What Approach S42 does better (2) and where Forerunner 255 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S42
Garmin · 2021Approach S42
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $300
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255
4.2Score
6 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
3.4Display3.5
2.7Battery life4.8
2.9Build & durability2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S42Forerunner 255
43.4 × 43.411.745.6 × 45.612.9
Approach S42Forerunner 255Difference
Height43.4 mm45.6 mm−2.2 mm
Width43.4 mm45.6 mm−2.2 mm
Thickness11.7 mm12.9 mm−1.2 mm
Weight43 g49 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S42 better than Forerunner 255?

  1. Weight43 g vs 49 g+14%
  2. Thickness11.7 mm vs 12.9 mm+10%

Why is Forerunner 255 better than Approach S42?

  1. GPS battery life15 h vs 30 h2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 14 days+40%
  3. Sport profiles5 vs 5811.6×
  4. Storage0.06 GB vs 4 GB66.7×
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  6. Resolution (width)240 px vs 260 px+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare