NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S42 vs Race S

Garmin Approach S42 vs Suunto Race S

What Approach S42 does better (2) and where Race S wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S42
Garmin · 2021Approach S42
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $300
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
9 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
3.4Display4.8
2.7Battery life4.6
2.9Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S42Race S
43.4 × 43.411.745 × 4511.4
Approach S42Race SDifference
Height43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Width43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness11.7 mm11.4 mm+0.3 mm
Weight43 g53 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S42 better than Race S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 9 days+11%
  2. Weight43 g vs 53 g+23%

Why is Race S better than Approach S42?

  1. GPS battery life15 h vs 40 h2.7×
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Sport profiles5 vs 9519×
  4. Storage0.06 GB vs 32 GB533.3×
  5. Sapphire crystalNo · Approach S42: Yes
  6. Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
  7. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  8. Pixel density200 ppi vs 353 ppi+76%
  9. Thickness11.7 mm vs 11.4 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare