NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S50 vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

Garmin Approach S50 vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

What Approach S50 does better (2) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S50
Garmin · 2025Approach S50
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $400
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
6 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
5.3Display5.6
2.7Battery life7.3
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.2Sports & outdoor6.6
3.9Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S50Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
43 × 4311.450 × 5014.4
Approach S50Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43 mm50 mm−7 mm
Width43 mm50 mm−7 mm
Thickness11.4 mm14.4 mm−3 mm
Weight29 g59 g−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S50 better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. Weight29 g vs 59 g2×
  2. Thickness11.4 mm vs 14.4 mm+26%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Approach S50?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 24 days2.4×
  2. GPS battery life15 h vs 40 h2.7×
  3. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  4. Sport profiles46 vs 962.1×
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare