NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S72 43mm vs Approach S72 47mm

Garmin Approach S72 43mm vs Garmin Approach S72 47mm

What Approach S72 43mm does better (2) and where Approach S72 47mm wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S72 43mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 43mm
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $800
vs
Garmin Approach S72 47mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 47mm
6.5Score
3 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
5.0Display6.5
8.3Health tracking8.3
6.7Sports & outdoor6.7
3.2Smart features3.2
5.3Build & durability5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S72 43mmApproach S72 47mm
43 × 4312.947 × 4713.5
Approach S72 43mmApproach S72 47mmDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness12.9 mm13.5 mm−0.6 mm
Weight41 g48 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S72 43mm better than Approach S72 47mm?

  1. Weight41 g vs 48 g+17%
  2. Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.5 mm+4%

Why is Approach S72 47mm better than Approach S72 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 16 days+60%
  2. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  3. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare