NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S72 43mm vs Forerunner 970

Garmin Approach S72 43mm vs Garmin Forerunner 970

What Approach S72 43mm does better (2) and where Forerunner 970 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S72 43mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 43mm
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 970
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 970
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ $750
5.0Display6.5
8.3Health tracking8.3
6.7Sports & outdoor6.6
3.2Smart features3.2
5.3Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S72 43mmForerunner 970
43 × 4312.947 × 4712.9
Approach S72 43mmForerunner 970Difference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.9 mm=
Weight41 g56 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S72 43mm better than Forerunner 970?

  1. Weight41 g vs 56 g+37%
  2. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×

Why is Forerunner 970 better than Approach S72 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 15 days+50%
  2. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  3. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare