NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S72 47mm vs Race 3S

Garmin Approach S72 47mm vs Suunto Race 3S

What Approach S72 47mm does better (3) and where Race 3S wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S72 47mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 47mm
6.5Score
3 advantages≈ $800
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
3 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
6.5Display7.1
8.3Health tracking4.9
6.7Sports & outdoor6.2
5.1Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S72 47mmRace 3S
47 × 4713.546 × 4611.4
Approach S72 47mmRace 3SDifference
Height47 mm46 mm+1 mm
Width47 mm46 mm+1 mm
Thickness13.5 mm11.4 mm+2.1 mm
Weight48 g56 g−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S72 47mm better than Race 3S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)16 days vs 12 days+33%
  2. Weight48 g vs 56 g+17%
  3. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.32″+6%

Why is Race 3S better than Approach S72 47mm?

  1. Thickness13.5 mm vs 11.4 mm+18%
  2. Pixel density324 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
  3. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare