vs
9.4Health tracking5.5
9.2Build & durability2.3
Why is CIRQA Smart Band better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
- Weight14.8 g vs 200 g13.5×
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than CIRQA Smart Band?
Ice Fit RT 3.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 27 mm | — |
| Weight | 14.8 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | — |
| Height | 47 mm | — |
| Width | 27 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | fabric (ComfortFit bands) | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | Swim, 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | No display | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 450 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | Lithium ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Charging | Garmin proprietary plug charger | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Temperature sensor | Yes | — |
| HRV tracking | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Pulse Ox blood oxygen saturation monitor, Accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Sport profiles | 78 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| ANT+ sensors | Yes | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Storage | 0.12 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Garmin OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS |
