NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent G2 vs Vantage V3

Garmin Descent G2 vs Polar Vantage V3

What Descent G2 does better (1) and where Vantage V3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent G2
Garmin · 2025Descent G2
5.7Score
1 advantage≈ $700
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage V3
Polar · 2023Vantage V3
5.6Score
7 advantages≈ $650
6.0Display8.3
2.9Battery life5.2
4.9Health tracking8.3
5.4Sports & outdoor2.9
9.4Build & durability3.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent G2Vantage V3
45.5 × 45.515.247.3 × 47.313.5
Descent G2Vantage V3Difference
Height45.5 mm47.3 mm−1.8 mm
Width45.5 mm47.3 mm−1.8 mm
Thickness15.2 mm13.5 mm+1.7 mm
Weight65 g57 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent G2 better than Vantage V3?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×

Why is Vantage V3 better than Descent G2?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 42 h2.1×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 11 days+10%
  3. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.39″+16%
  5. Weight65 g vs 57 g+14%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
  7. Thickness15.2 mm vs 13.5 mm+13%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare