NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent G2 vs Vertical 2

Garmin Descent G2 vs Suunto Vertical 2

What Descent G2 does better (2) and where Vertical 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent G2
Garmin · 2025Descent G2
5.7Score
2 advantages≈ $700
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
7 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
6.0Display6.3
2.9Battery life8.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.4Sports & outdoor6.4
9.4Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent G2Vertical 2
45.5 × 45.515.249 × 4913.6
Descent G2Vertical 2Difference
Height45.5 mm49 mm−3.5 mm
Width45.5 mm49 mm−3.5 mm
Thickness15.2 mm13.6 mm+1.6 mm
Weight65 g87 g−22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent G2 better than Vertical 2?

  1. Weight65 g vs 87 g+34%
  2. Pixel density325 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Vertical 2 better than Descent G2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 20 days2×
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 75 h3.8×
  3. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.5″+25%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  6. Thickness15.2 mm vs 13.6 mm+12%
  7. Sport profiles93 vs 95+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare