NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk2S vs Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED

Garmin Descent Mk2S vs Garmin Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED

What Descent Mk2S does better (3) and where Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk2S
Garmin · 2021Descent Mk2S
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ $1,000
vs
Garmin Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED
6.0Score
8 advantages≈ $1,000
Higher score
2.9Display5.7
2.2Battery life3.6
4.9Health tracking8.3
4.8Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features3.2
9.6Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk2SFenix 8 43mm AMOLED
43 × 4314.243 × 4313.8
Descent Mk2SFenix 8 43mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43 mm43 mm=
Width43 mm43 mm=
Thickness14.2 mm13.8 mm+0.3 mm
Weight60 g66 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk2S better than Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED?

  1. Rated dive depth100 m vs 40 m2.5×
  2. Weight60 g vs 66 g+10%
  3. Battery saver mode21 days vs 15 days+40%

Why is Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED better than Descent Mk2S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 10 days+43%
  2. GPS battery life18 h vs 28 h+56%
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Descent Mk2S: Yes
  4. Sport profiles44 vs 992.2×
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  6. Resolution (width)240 px vs 416 px+73%
  7. Pixel density200 ppi vs 320 ppi+60%
  8. Thickness14.2 mm vs 13.8 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare