NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED vs Grit X2 Pro

Garmin Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED vs Polar Grit X2 Pro

What Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED does better (2) and where Grit X2 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $1,000
vs
Polar Grit X2 Pro
Polar · 2024Grit X2 Pro
6.7Score
6 advantages≈ $810
Higher score
5.7Display8.3
3.6Battery life5.1
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor2.9
8.0Build & durability6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 8 43mm AMOLEDGrit X2 Pro
43 × 4313.848.6 × 48.613.4
Fenix 8 43mm AMOLEDGrit X2 ProDifference
Height43 mm48.6 mm−5.6 mm
Width43 mm48.6 mm−5.6 mm
Thickness13.8 mm13.4 mm+0.4 mm
Weight66 g79 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED better than Grit X2 Pro?

  1. LED flashlightYes · Grit X2 Pro: No
  2. Weight66 g vs 79 g+20%

Why is Grit X2 Pro better than Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 40 h+43%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 11 days+10%
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.39″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
  5. Thickness13.8 mm vs 13.4 mm+3%
  6. Pixel density320 ppi vs 327 ppi+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare