NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Grit X2 Pro

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Polar Grit X2 Pro

What Fenix E 47mm AMOLED does better (3) and where Grit X2 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
6.4Score
3 advantages≈ $800
vs
Polar Grit X2 Pro
Polar · 2024Grit X2 Pro
6.7Score
5 advantages≈ $810
Higher score
5.7Display8.3
6.7Battery life5.1
4.9Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor2.9
5.0Build & durability6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDGrit X2 Pro
47 × 4714.548.6 × 48.613.4
Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDGrit X2 ProDifference
Height47 mm48.6 mm−1.6 mm
Width47 mm48.6 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness14.5 mm13.4 mm+1.1 mm
Weight76 g79 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix E 47mm AMOLED better than Grit X2 Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)16 days vs 11 days+45%
  2. GPS battery life42 h vs 40 h+5%
  3. Weight76 g vs 79 g+4%

Why is Grit X2 Pro better than Fenix E 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Storage16 GB vs 32 GB2×
  2. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.39″+7%
  3. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
  4. Thickness14.5 mm vs 13.4 mm+8%
  5. Pixel density320 ppi vs 327 ppi+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare