NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk2S vs Pro 3 Ultra

Garmin Descent Mk2S vs Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra

What Descent Mk2S does better (2) and where Pro 3 Ultra wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk2S
Garmin · 2021Descent Mk2S
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $1,000
vs
Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra
Ticwatch · 2022Pro 3 Ultra
5.4Score
5 advantages
Higher score
2.9Display6.8
2.2Battery life3.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.8Sports & outdoor5.6
6.5Smart features6.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk2SPro 3 Ultra
43 × 4314.248 × 4712.2
Descent Mk2SPro 3 UltraDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm48 mm−5 mm
Thickness14.2 mm12.2 mm+2 mm
Weight60 g41 g+19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk2S better than Pro 3 Ultra?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 3 days2.3×
  2. Storage32 GB vs 8 GB4×

Why is Pro 3 Ultra better than Descent Mk2S?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Descent Mk2S: Yes
  2. Weight60 g vs 41 g+46%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  4. Resolution (width)240 px vs 454 px+89%
  5. Thickness14.2 mm vs 12.2 mm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare