NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3 43mm vs Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 51mm

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm vs Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 51mm

What Descent Mk3 43mm does better (3) and where Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 51mm wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3 43mm
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,200
vs
Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 51mm
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
6.0Display7.5
3.4Battery life9.2
9.4Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features6.5
9.7Build & durability7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3 43mmEpix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 51mm
43 × 4314.251 × 5115
Descent Mk3 43mmEpix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 51mmDifference
Height43 mm51 mm−8 mm
Width43 mm51 mm−8 mm
Thickness14.2 mm15 mm−0.8 mm
Weight54 g88 g−34 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3 43mm better than Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 51mm?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight53.5 g vs 88 g+64%
  3. Thickness14.2 mm vs 15 mm+6%

Why is Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 51mm better than Descent Mk3 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 31 days3.1×
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 82 h2.9×
  3. Battery life with always-on display4 days vs 11 days2.8×
  4. Battery saver mode12 days vs 41 days3.4×
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)17 h vs 38 h2.2×
  6. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare