NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3 43mm vs Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm vs Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED

What Descent Mk3 43mm does better (3) and where Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3 43mm
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,200
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
8.0Score
7 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
6.0Display7.5
3.4Battery life6.8
9.4Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features3.2
9.7Build & durability7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3 43mmQuatix 8 47mm AMOLED
43 × 4314.247 × 4713.8
Descent Mk3 43mmQuatix 8 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness14.2 mm13.8 mm+0.3 mm
Weight54 g73 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3 43mm better than Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Rated dive depth200 m vs 40 m5×
  3. Weight53.5 g vs 73 g+36%

Why is Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED better than Descent Mk3 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 16 days+60%
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 47 h+68%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  4. Battery saver mode12 days vs 23 days+92%
  5. Battery life with always-on display4 days vs 7 days+75%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
  7. Thickness14.2 mm vs 13.8 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare